Act of Consequence: Muslim March on Washington

A simple question to the federal government and Barack Hussein Obama …

Why fight against Islamic fascists and jihadists in foreign lands when they are subverting and plotting here in the United States?

The American Muslim Political Action Committee (AMPAC) planned and successfully received a permit to march on Washington DC today on September 11^th – tasteless (to say the least) considering it is scheduled for the anniversary of the worst domestic massacre in American history perpetrated in the name of Islam.

And what is the group's theme and reason for such a march?

To deny the truth that followers of Islam, Muslims, have committed atrocities and acts of crimes against humanity around the world, to include the orchestrated attack on September 11^th, 2001 now known as “911”.

To counter that affront to Americans, two million bikers are to coincide the Million Muslim March who have been turned down in their request to ride through Memorial Core near to the Memorial Bridge. But they are riding anyway, except without police help to usher them through stop signs and stop lights.

Since when do Americans need permission for the right to demonstrate? It is called freedom of assembly and made clear in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, along with freedom of speech and religion:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Muslims, orchestrated by AMPAC, sponsored by organizations like CAIR, which in turn is funded by foreign Muslim fascist fundamental organizations have the right to assemble whether why they are assembling is based upon any truth or not – and whether they are being insensitive to the fact that today, September 11^th, has been declared Patriot Day to remember those who fell victim to Islamic senseless hatred and violence that permeates the core of their religion; a religion that represents hypocrisy and intolerance, while demanding tolerance of others. One year ago today, Islamic fascists under the organization of the Muslim Brotherhood murdered an American ambassador and three other Americans, injuring others in a place called Benghazi. No action was taken and originally the act was blamed on some obscure American making a video, which is also protected under the First Amendment; but no matter to federal government who now literally holds him as a political prisoner.

To the federal and some state governments, protesting under the right to peacefully assemble, must be made legal through obtaining a permit.The Constitutional amendment states nothing about a permit.

Even the documents of the United Nations and other international declarations provide freedom of assembly: Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 20; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 21; European Convention on Human Rights, Article 11; and the American Convention on Human Rights, Article 15.

So, why does AMPAC have the right to assemble and not American Bikers forming together to ride in the memory of victims of Islamic hatred and violence?

Muslims not only want to change our traditions and heritage, but throw salt in wounds committed against citizens of the United States.

Islamic training camps/centers are untouched and mainstream media does not cover the fact that such institutions are operating in the United States; but jump on a story they can write negatively about concerning American militia organizations. The hypocrisy not only belongs to Islamic subversive organizations. They are aided by political prostitutes that Americans vote into office or are elected through voting fraudulent acts, who cater to the enemy of freedom and liberty backed by a media that is used as a propaganda tool.

Constitutionalists and Christian organizations like the Tea Party movement are considered enemies of the federal government. The real enemy is ignored.

Christians are persecuted for their belief and hindered in publicly displaying their traditions and beliefs that is part of the American tradition, heritage and history – like Christmas, for example. Yet, Muslims, who declare that such things offend them, are allowed to do what they will. Schools that are government controlled [and funded] by the federal government and to some degree the state government declare that Christianity cannot be displayed; yet they are giving classes on Islam for a better understanding. Once upon a time in America there were after-school activities like chess clubs, rifle sports clubs, and Christian clubs. It did not interfere with school curriculum and afforded students to gather together who had the same interests.

Those days, like providing cultural classes and classical educational curriculum are fading into the dustbin of history – along with our traditions and heritage.

Christianity, Judeo-Christian philosophy, was and has been the fundamental foundation of the principles of our US Constitution and its amendments; yet that document also declares freedom for all religions – as long as they are just as tolerant and respectful to other religions.

Atheists and Muslims declare they are “offended” at the sight of display of Christian symbolism; providing total disregard to Christian sensibilities and liberties. It is okay to insult a Christian by depicting Jesus Christ in some profane manner at an art exhibit, but forbidden is the act of speaking up and about Islamic hypocrisy and its doctrine of hate, intolerance, and violence against ALL religions that are not Islamic.

Christians have the tradition of following the example of disciples and feel responsible to spread the “Word” - the words recorded in the Gospels that is described as evangelism. Even that has been painted as people who are lunatic and fanatics complements of the socialist-minded, progressive orientated mainstream media in the United States that is no longer the eyes and ears of the People, but a mouthpiece for government propaganda.

Jesus stopped the stoning to death of a woman found guilty of adultery, a tradition of ancient Hebrews because his duty, his calling, was to reform those who proclaimed that there is only one true God. His reason to those committing the stoning: if any of them had no guilt, than let them throw the first stone.

Mohammad, the founder of Islam and the holy prophet of Muslims, wrote the Qur'an, which is as holy to Muslims as the Bible [Old and New Testaments] to the Christians as the Torah is to orthodox Jews. The Old Testament is a history and description of the Hebrews and the Jewish faith in the one true God; and the Qur'an was written in the same vein except it had become the law for both religious doctrine and civic government in the Islamic world. The New Testament is made up of Gospels, letters and documents written by the apostles, followers of Jesus the Christ of Nazareth/Galilee. Jesus was a Jew who followed Hebrew traditions like Passover and preached peace and preparation for an afterlife. Mohammad provided the foundation of a doctrine that eventually declared all non-Muslims to be infidels, whether they were People of the Book [scriptures] or not. Christianity seeks conversion through testimony and understanding of the teachings of Jesus the Christ; while Islam's method of conversion is the sword and fear of retribution; or in some cases lives made miserable through heavy taxation upon non-Muslims in periods of the religion's history that allowed the presence of non-Muslims within their Caliphate.

The Christian Church during the medieval period in history certainly showed little or no tolerance; but as the age of enlightenment brought about the establishment of the United States – so did that intolerance disappear. That tolerance, however, did not and does not discount the fundamental of Christianity such as the declaration of the Gospels that homosexuality is an abomination in the sight of God. Again, the difference between Christianity and Islam is that the former does not execute homosexuals by stoning, strangulating or beheading those who choose homosexuality as their sexual preference.

Despite these hard facts, Christians in America are persecuted and looked upon as “zealous” and “fanatic” if they profess their beliefs and insist upon some level of morality to be retained within the society of the United States. Indeed, the woes that has befallen the republic that provided the best civic document within the articles of Constitution and its amendments can be pinpointed to the fact that American society has fallen away from any avenue of morality or common core values that make any society great and any nation a successful civilization.

In the first book in the Holy Bible, Old Testament, the Book of Genesis, God establishes a covenant with humanity and grants freedom of choice – it is what the Founders referred to as natural rights in their presentation and establishment of the Constitution and when they wrote the Declaration of Independence. Freedom of religion, speech, and assembly was so important it became the first amendment to the US Constitution. The Second Amendment provides the right personal defence and the right to act as militia to defend the Constitution and the United States of America against foreign and domestic enemies. That too has been considered a natural right, whether one is defending oneself and/or others against a wild animal or a predatory human being. It is called self preservation and that the means of defense is an unalienable right, which has nothing to do with hunting for food.

Freedom of religion does not protect any religion whose doctrine is hatred, intolerance, and violence against other religions; and if so, their doctrine must be denounced and their ideology be discounted. That is not hypocrisy, as fundamental Muslims practice, but fairness and justice in dealing with civic life.

Our government was established to be For the People and By the People; therefore it is not required that those who operate our government turn their heads when it comes to constitutional law and neither are they expected to tolerate any subversive movement that threatens the constitutional rights of the People and the national security of our nation, its heritage and traditions. There is a difference between dissension and subversion, the former addressing grievances upon a government that has become tyrannical and ignores constitutional law.

It is time that the government of the United States, at all levels, no longer tolerate religious establishments, i.e., mosques or organizations, i.e. CAIR and AMPAC who use the tolerance of the American people as a weapon in order to establish Sharia Law intended to replace the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. That is their agenda, as it is in other free nations around the globe – world domination with a caliphate world government.

The theme of this blog is phenomenology and history of world religions and not to demean any one religion of any people around the globe; however, this article was written as a warning to people who want the freedom of choice in the name of tolerance – and to disclaim any religious doctrine that does not recognize that natural right of freedom of choice.

The United States, Europe and other free nations must take a stand against intolerance no matter whence it comes, for evil can only undermine good when the righteous do nothing.

If Islam, Muslims, want to be considered people of peace, a religion of peace – then their doctrine and actions must show it. If there are truly “moderate” Muslims, then they must denounce the fundamental fascists that are predominate in their religious communities. Fear is the gist of reaching their goal of conquest through atrocities and murderous acts against humanity in the name of Allah, the Creator. The Creator has many names in different languages and dialects, about 86 – but inhumane acts upon one another cannot possibly be the will of that Creator.